<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Keeps on Screwing Us!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bobbuskirk.com/google-keeps-on-screwing-us.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bobbuskirk.com/google-keeps-on-screwing-us.html</link>
	<description>Yes I Make Money Online</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 07:41:56 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ed Kohler</title>
		<link>http://www.bobbuskirk.com/google-keeps-on-screwing-us.html#comment-16320</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Kohler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2007 17:50:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bobbuskirk.com/google-keeps-on-screwing-us.html#comment-16320</guid>
		<description>As an advertiser, I'll pay Google more for traffic that converts better than the accidental clicks you've been profiting from.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As an advertiser, I&#8217;ll pay Google more for traffic that converts better than the accidental clicks you&#8217;ve been profiting from.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TDave</title>
		<link>http://www.bobbuskirk.com/google-keeps-on-screwing-us.html#comment-16302</link>
		<dc:creator>TDave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2007 08:41:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bobbuskirk.com/google-keeps-on-screwing-us.html#comment-16302</guid>
		<description>Bob,

Sorry to hear about those Google penalties.  I had one drupal site that I installed a TLA module on drop from 4 to 3, but the weird thing is I never sold any links on it.  I guess google just saw TLA's javascript and penalized me.  Not really a big deal for that site and I have seen no drop in my search rankings.

There are a lot of people that are pissed with Google right now - and rightly so.  Wendy Piersall from emomsathome recently wrote a post that I replied to.  She made a good point - that paid text link ads have been around longer than Google.  If Google keeps taking this stance I think you are gonna 1) see a lot more people get pissed at Google; 2) you are gonna see somebody, or a group of people, sue Google for millions/billions of dollars.  

I don't blame Google for protecting their search ranking algorithms, but they should not be punishing publishers.  It's expecially questionable as those penalties directly effect their advertising competitors.  I wouldn't be suprised to see TLA and some of these ReviewMe sites file that lawsuit I mentioned.

Google can obviously determine which sites to penalize, so they have the capability to just disregard certain links coming from those sites.  It costs google money to find the culprits either way, so instead of ticking everyone off they should just disregard those sites instead of trying to play "Sherriff of the Internet."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bob,</p>
<p>Sorry to hear about those Google penalties.  I had one drupal site that I installed a TLA module on drop from 4 to 3, but the weird thing is I never sold any links on it.  I guess google just saw TLA&#8217;s javascript and penalized me.  Not really a big deal for that site and I have seen no drop in my search rankings.</p>
<p>There are a lot of people that are pissed with Google right now - and rightly so.  Wendy Piersall from emomsathome recently wrote a post that I replied to.  She made a good point - that paid text link ads have been around longer than Google.  If Google keeps taking this stance I think you are gonna 1) see a lot more people get pissed at Google; 2) you are gonna see somebody, or a group of people, sue Google for millions/billions of dollars.  </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t blame Google for protecting their search ranking algorithms, but they should not be punishing publishers.  It&#8217;s expecially questionable as those penalties directly effect their advertising competitors.  I wouldn&#8217;t be suprised to see TLA and some of these ReviewMe sites file that lawsuit I mentioned.</p>
<p>Google can obviously determine which sites to penalize, so they have the capability to just disregard certain links coming from those sites.  It costs google money to find the culprits either way, so instead of ticking everyone off they should just disregard those sites instead of trying to play &#8220;Sherriff of the Internet.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Huang</title>
		<link>http://www.bobbuskirk.com/google-keeps-on-screwing-us.html#comment-16301</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Huang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2007 08:23:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bobbuskirk.com/google-keeps-on-screwing-us.html#comment-16301</guid>
		<description>Google will always be on TOP no matter what happens.

-Mike</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google will always be on TOP no matter what happens.</p>
<p>-Mike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Living Room Furniture</title>
		<link>http://www.bobbuskirk.com/google-keeps-on-screwing-us.html#comment-16294</link>
		<dc:creator>Living Room Furniture</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2007 04:21:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bobbuskirk.com/google-keeps-on-screwing-us.html#comment-16294</guid>
		<description>That is the problem: Google owns the internet, it is all pervasive and omni present. And now it is using its awesome power to be an imperialist dictator.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is the problem: Google owns the internet, it is all pervasive and omni present. And now it is using its awesome power to be an imperialist dictator.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hair Loss Treatment</title>
		<link>http://www.bobbuskirk.com/google-keeps-on-screwing-us.html#comment-16292</link>
		<dc:creator>Hair Loss Treatment</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2007 04:10:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bobbuskirk.com/google-keeps-on-screwing-us.html#comment-16292</guid>
		<description>It's hard to say whether what is happening is right or wrong. Penalizing sites which buy text links has worked good for the genuine sites, who have worked their way hard to get to the top by all white hat methods. Sites which have not bought links have had an increase in their PR.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s hard to say whether what is happening is right or wrong. Penalizing sites which buy text links has worked good for the genuine sites, who have worked their way hard to get to the top by all white hat methods. Sites which have not bought links have had an increase in their PR.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen</title>
		<link>http://www.bobbuskirk.com/google-keeps-on-screwing-us.html#comment-16269</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 19:31:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bobbuskirk.com/google-keeps-on-screwing-us.html#comment-16269</guid>
		<description>There's no doubt that Google needs to pull their heads out of their asses with the recent bitch slapping, but the change in the ads aren't such a bad thing.  In fact, this should improve the user experience.

I always end up clicking on those things by accident and get taken somewhere else, not the site I was looking at. I've even done it by accident on my own sites. I realize that this change will decrease the click through rate somewhat, but it will also allow you to keep your readers on your page longer and not piss them off, never to return.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s no doubt that Google needs to pull their heads out of their asses with the recent bitch slapping, but the change in the ads aren&#8217;t such a bad thing.  In fact, this should improve the user experience.</p>
<p>I always end up clicking on those things by accident and get taken somewhere else, not the site I was looking at. I&#8217;ve even done it by accident on my own sites. I realize that this change will decrease the click through rate somewhat, but it will also allow you to keep your readers on your page longer and not piss them off, never to return.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas De Maesschalck</title>
		<link>http://www.bobbuskirk.com/google-keeps-on-screwing-us.html#comment-16265</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas De Maesschalck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 18:25:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bobbuskirk.com/google-keeps-on-screwing-us.html#comment-16265</guid>
		<description>http://finance.google.com/finance?q=goog

It's already back at +$660.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?q=goog" rel="nofollow">http://finance.google.com/finance?q=goog</a></p>
<p>It&#8217;s already back at +$660.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BigMan</title>
		<link>http://www.bobbuskirk.com/google-keeps-on-screwing-us.html#comment-16262</link>
		<dc:creator>BigMan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 17:32:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bobbuskirk.com/google-keeps-on-screwing-us.html#comment-16262</guid>
		<description>I agree on this, rbmods.com dropped from 5 to 0 but I still get the same traffic from Google as before, I am confused.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree on this, rbmods.com dropped from 5 to 0 but I still get the same traffic from Google as before, I am confused.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg</title>
		<link>http://www.bobbuskirk.com/google-keeps-on-screwing-us.html#comment-16261</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 17:25:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bobbuskirk.com/google-keeps-on-screwing-us.html#comment-16261</guid>
		<description>Bad move on Google's part.  Their stock dropped over $50 in 3 days because of this. Now the question is, is it going to go back up? I doubt it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bad move on Google&#8217;s part.  Their stock dropped over $50 in 3 days because of this. Now the question is, is it going to go back up? I doubt it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary Lee</title>
		<link>http://www.bobbuskirk.com/google-keeps-on-screwing-us.html#comment-16256</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 16:09:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bobbuskirk.com/google-keeps-on-screwing-us.html#comment-16256</guid>
		<description>i've been talking with a lot of yahoo people and it seems they have something up their sleeves in the next couple of years . . . . it should give Google a run for their money . . . ok, maybe a run for some of their money!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i&#8217;ve been talking with a lot of yahoo people and it seems they have something up their sleeves in the next couple of years . . . . it should give Google a run for their money . . . ok, maybe a run for some of their money!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
